{
 "meta": {
  "titel": "GTN Group – Knowledge base",
  "untertitel": "Glossary, value framework, principles, rule base, decision framework",
  "version": "0.3",
  "stand": "2026-10-17",
  "status": "Working version. Value foundation: given (fixed). Principles and rules: derived or proposed. None of it is final.",
  "kennzeichnung": {
   "F": "fixed (given by the value foundation)",
   "A": "derived (justifiable from what is given, revisable)",
   "V": "proposed (rule or definition, testable, not confirmed)",
   "H": "hypothesis (open until decided)",
   "S": "tension or unresolved"
  },
  "maschinenlesbar": "data/wissen.en.json"
 },
 "werte": [
  {
   "id": "wahrheit",
   "name": "Truth",
   "status": "F",
   "definition": "Recognising reality, practising sincerity and correcting one's own assumptions.",
   "rolle": "Direction of knowing: not what is pleasant, but what is accurate.",
   "praxis": "Establish before interpreting. Separate facts from assumptions. Make corrections visible.",
   "prueffrage": "Is it evidenced? What do we not know?"
  },
  {
   "id": "bewusstheit",
   "name": "Awareness",
   "status": "F",
   "definition": "Consciously perceiving oneself, others, connections and consequences.",
   "rolle": "Capacity of knowing: opening the view, seeing preconditions and consequences.",
   "praxis": "Name those affected and the consequences before deciding. See the part within the whole.",
   "prueffrage": "Whom and what does it affect, and what are we assuming?"
  },
  {
   "id": "weisheit",
   "name": "Wisdom",
   "status": "F",
   "definition": "Combining insight, experience and judgement into appropriate action.",
   "rolle": "Judgement: how knowing becomes a decision that fits the situation.",
   "praxis": "Measure, not maximum. The stakes determine the care. Never claimed as a self-description.",
   "prueffrage": "Is it appropriate?"
  },
  {
   "id": "liebe",
   "name": "Love",
   "status": "F",
   "definition": "Recognising the worth of the other and of reality, and aligning one's own actions with it.",
   "rolle": "Stance in relationships: recognise worth before calculating benefit, and act accordingly.",
   "praxis": "Treat clients, partners, staff and competitors as valuable. Care in the details. Room for the other.",
   "prueffrage": "Is it dignified?",
   "hinweis": "Version 0.1 called this dimension appreciation. Love is the inner, complete form (recognising and aligning one's actions with it); appreciation is its visible, verifiable form. In this architecture love is the value and appreciation its evidence. Externally (home page, stance) we use the verifiable word. Status of this reading: H."
  }
 ],
 "disziplin": {
  "name": "Discipline",
  "status": "A",
  "definition": "Consistently turning recognised values and reasoned decisions into action.",
  "analyse": [
   "The four values answer what matters: what is accurate (truth), the connection (awareness), what is appropriate (wisdom), the worth of the other (love). Discipline answers none of these questions. It has no content of its own: one can do the wrong thing with discipline.",
   "Discipline therefore does not belong on the level of values (what holds) but on the level of principles (how one acts). It is the implementation principle that closes the chain from decision to action, and at the same time the condition for the four values to have effect.",
   "In the image of the cycle: the four values are the points on the circle, discipline is the movement along it. Without it the circle remains a picture.",
   "Consequence for the architecture: four values, one implementation principle. Discipline appears in the principles (P5, P8), in the rule base (R7, R8) and as a condition in the fourth question. This placement is derived, not fixed, and needs Nicolai's confirmation."
  ]
 },
 "prinzipien": [
  {
   "id": "P1",
   "name": "Reality first",
   "aus": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Establish before interpreting, show before telling. Facts are checked before judging."
  },
  {
   "id": "P2",
   "name": "See the connection",
   "aus": [
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "No detail without context, no decision without regard to those affected and the consequences."
  },
  {
   "id": "P3",
   "name": "Appropriate, not maximal",
   "aus": [
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Measure is the criterion, not size. The stakes of a decision determine the care it receives."
  },
  {
   "id": "P4",
   "name": "Recognise worth",
   "aus": [
    "liebe"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Everyone involved has worth before they have use. This applies to clients, partners, staff, competitors and critics."
  },
  {
   "id": "P5",
   "name": "Stay correctable",
   "aus": [
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Mistakes are named, versions dated, changes justified and made visible. Correction is discipline in the service of truth."
  },
  {
   "id": "P6",
   "name": "Distinguish, do not blur",
   "aus": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit",
    "weisheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Fact from assumption, ideal from implementation, substance from form, value from rule. Every statement carries its status."
  },
  {
   "id": "P7",
   "name": "People remain the purpose",
   "aus": [
    "liebe",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Processes, systems and automation serve people. Where they do not, they are changed or abolished."
  },
  {
   "id": "P8",
   "name": "What is decided gets done",
   "aus": [
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "A decision without implementation is no decision. What has been decided is implemented within a named deadline or explicitly handed back."
  },
  {
   "id": "P9",
   "name": "Involve those affected",
   "aus": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "status": "A",
   "text": "Whoever is affected by a decision is involved or at least informed before it takes effect. The degree of involvement follows the stakes."
  }
 ],
 "fragen": [
  {
   "id": "Q2",
   "frage": "Is it possible?",
   "typ": "Feasibility check (facts with uncertainty)",
   "art": "Gate",
   "bedeutung": "Can the action be carried out in fact and in law: resources, time, capabilities, legality, data? The question tests feasibility, not impossibility. An unclear factual situation is a result of its own (clarify), not a no.",
   "dimensionen": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "eindeutigkeit": "Possible does not mean permitted. Legality counts here as a hard condition of feasibility; anyone wanting to test it separately adds it as a sub-question (status: H).",
   "variablen": [
    "M(H)",
    "F(H)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "Q3",
   "frage": "Is it dignified?",
   "typ": "Ethical weighing",
   "art": "Gate",
   "bedeutung": "Two readings, both apply: does the action respect the worth and dignity of everyone affected? And is it worthy of the group, could we show it openly? Both tests must be passed.",
   "dimensionen": [
    "liebe",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "eindeutigkeit": "The transparency test (could we show it openly) makes the question testable: an action that only works when hidden is not dignified.",
   "variablen": [
    "W(H)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "Q1",
   "frage": "Is it appropriate?",
   "typ": "Weighing (gradual, normative)",
   "art": "Measure",
   "bedeutung": "Is the action in proportion to goal, effort, consequences and stakes? Appropriate is relative: appropriate for what and for whom. The reference point must be named.",
   "dimensionen": [
    "weisheit",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "eindeutigkeit": "Without a named reference point (goal, those affected, alternative) the question cannot be answered. A no means rebuild, not discard.",
   "variablen": [
    "A(H)",
    "T(H)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "Q4",
   "frage": "Are we all involved?",
   "typ": "Participation and commitment (process condition)",
   "art": "Condition",
   "bedeutung": "Two readings, both apply: are all those affected involved or informed (participation test)? And do all who must act stand behind the decision (commitment test)? The second test is the precondition for discipline to take hold.",
   "dimensionen": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "liebe",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "eindeutigkeit": "Involvement is not unanimity. With low stakes, information suffices; with high stakes, participation before the decision is required.",
   "variablen": [
    "B(H)",
    "Z(H)"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "fragen_zusammenwirken": {
  "reihenfolge": [
   "Q2 possible (facts and feasibility)",
   "Q3 dignified (hard limit)",
   "Q1 appropriate (weighing)",
   "Q4 involved (precondition for implementation)"
  ],
  "begruendung": "Facts first, then the ethical limit, then the measure, then the condition for implementation. This order prevents something from passing as appropriate that is impossible or undignified.",
  "zielkonflikte": [
   "Appropriate versus involved: participation takes time. Rule: with low stakes, information may follow action; with medium and high stakes, participation comes first.",
   "Possible versus dignified: possible but undignified means no. Dignified but impossible means rebuild or postpone.",
   "Appropriate versus implementation: an appropriate decision that nobody carries fails at Q4. Then the decision has become too small or the participation too large."
  ],
  "menschliches_urteil": [
   "when one of the questions is answered unclear and cannot be clarified in reasonable time",
   "when the weighing in Q1 is close or those affected assess it differently",
   "when the action is irreversible or has high stakes (approval)",
   "when a rule is to be overridden",
   "when two values are in genuine tension and no rule resolves it"
  ],
  "abbildung_0_1": "The four questions of version 0.1 (Is it true? Do we see the connection and consequences? Is it appropriate? Does it honour the worth of everyone involved?) are absorbed into the four questions of version 0.2: Is it true → Q2 (fact check), connection and consequences → Q1 and Q4, appropriate → Q1, honours → Q3."
 },
 "variablen": [
  {
   "symbol": "H",
   "name": "Action",
   "art": "Object",
   "werte": "a concrete action or decision under review"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "K",
   "name": "Context",
   "art": "Object",
   "werte": "company, goals, resources, data, responsibilities, deadlines, legal framework"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "F(H)",
   "name": "Facts",
   "art": "Fact",
   "werte": "evidenced · unevidenced · contradictory",
   "quelle": "Truth"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "M(H)",
   "name": "Feasibility",
   "art": "Fact with uncertainty",
   "werte": "yes · no · unclear",
   "quelle": "Q2 possible"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "W(H)",
   "name": "Dignity",
   "art": "Value judgement",
   "werte": "yes · no · unclear",
   "quelle": "Q3 dignified"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "A(H)",
   "name": "Appropriateness",
   "art": "Value judgement, gradual",
   "werte": "yes · no · unclear (with named reference point)",
   "quelle": "Q1 appropriate"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "B(H)",
   "name": "Involvement",
   "art": "Process state",
   "werte": "yes · no · unclear (those affected involved, those acting committed)",
   "quelle": "Q4 involved"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "R(H)",
   "name": "Reversibility",
   "art": "Fact with assessment",
   "werte": "reversible · irreversible",
   "quelle": "Wisdom, awareness"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "T(H)",
   "name": "Stakes",
   "art": "Assessment",
   "werte": "low · medium · high (thresholds per company in context K)",
   "quelle": "Awareness"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "Z(H)",
   "name": "Responsible person or role",
   "art": "Assignment",
   "werte": "exactly one per action; authority from K",
   "quelle": "Governance"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "t_max",
   "name": "Implementation deadline",
   "art": "Assignment",
   "werte": "period within which a decision must be implemented or handed back (from K)",
   "quelle": "Discipline"
  },
  {
   "symbol": "U(H)",
   "name": "Uncertainty",
   "art": "Derived",
   "werte": "true as soon as one of M, W, A, B is unclear or F is contradictory",
   "quelle": "Truth"
  }
 ],
 "regeln": [
  {
   "id": "R1",
   "name": "Admissibility",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "normative with factual component",
   "formal": "admissible(H) ⇔ M(H) = yes ∧ W(H) = yes ∧ F(H) ≠ contradictory",
   "text": "An action is only admissible if it is feasible and dignified and the facts are not contradictory. Impossible or undignified is a no, not a weighing.",
   "ausnahmen": "none",
   "grenzen": "W is a value judgement; it is made by Z(H). If W is disputed, not the rule but a human decides (R10).",
   "aus": [
    "P1",
    "P4"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R2",
   "name": "Appropriateness",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "normative, gradual",
   "formal": "admissible(H) ∧ A(H) = yes ⇒ executable(H); admissible(H) ∧ A(H) = no ⇒ rebuild(H)",
   "text": "An admissible action is carried out if it is appropriate. If it is not, it is changed (scope, timing, form), not discarded.",
   "ausnahmen": "If no rebuild reaches A = yes, the action is postponed and this is recorded.",
   "grenzen": "A needs a named reference point (goal, those affected, alternative).",
   "aus": [
    "P3"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R3",
   "name": "Involvement",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "normative, procedural",
   "formal": "B(H) = no ∧ T(H) ≥ medium ⇒ involve first, then decide; B(H) = no ∧ T(H) = low ⇒ execute, inform those affected",
   "text": "With medium and high stakes, those affected are involved before the decision. With low stakes, informing them afterwards suffices.",
   "ausnahmen": "Imminent danger: act, then involve, document.",
   "grenzen": "Who is affected is determined by awareness (P2), not convenience.",
   "aus": [
    "P9",
    "P2"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R4",
   "name": "Approval",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "normative",
   "formal": "R(H) = irreversible ∨ T(H) = high ⇒ approval required(H) by Z(H) with authority; R(H) = reversible ∧ T(H) = low ⇒ execute without approval, with documentation",
   "text": "The need for approval follows from reversibility and stakes, not from hierarchy. Reversible actions with low stakes are done without approval and documented.",
   "ausnahmen": "A company may set stricter thresholds, never looser ones (R9).",
   "grenzen": "Assessing R and T is itself an assessment with uncertainty; when in doubt, the stricter classification applies.",
   "aus": [
    "P3"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R5",
   "name": "Uncertainty",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "Procedure",
   "formal": "U(H) ∧ T(H) ≥ medium ⇒ clarify before deciding; U(H) ∧ ¬clarifiable(H, t) ⇒ a human decides, uncertainty is documented",
   "text": "What is unclear is clarified before deciding, in proportion to the stakes. What cannot be clarified is decided explicitly by a human under named uncertainty.",
   "ausnahmen": "With low stakes, reversible action under uncertainty is allowed.",
   "grenzen": "The rule only prevents paralysis if t (time to clarify) is set in the context.",
   "aus": [
    "P1",
    "P6"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R6",
   "name": "Order of checks",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "Procedure",
   "formal": "Order: F → M → W → A → B → (R, T) → approval → implementation",
   "text": "First facts, then feasibility, then the ethical limit, then the measure, then involvement, then reversibility and stakes, then approval, then implementation.",
   "ausnahmen": "Obvious lack of dignity may end the check immediately.",
   "grenzen": "The order is procedure, not truth; it serves consistency.",
   "aus": [
    "P1",
    "P6"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R7",
   "name": "Duty to implement",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "normative (discipline)",
   "formal": "decided(H) ∧ ¬implemented(H, t_max) ⇒ hand back to Z(H) with reasons; implementation without decision ⇒ inadmissible",
   "text": "What has been decided is implemented within the deadline or explicitly handed back. What has not been decided is not implemented.",
   "ausnahmen": "New facts (R8) interrupt the deadline.",
   "grenzen": "t_max must be set in the context; without a deadline the rule has no effect.",
   "aus": [
    "P8"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R8",
   "name": "Correction",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "Procedure (truth)",
   "formal": "F'(H) contradicts F(H) ⇒ re-examine decision (R6); change ⇒ new version with reasons, old version stays readable",
   "text": "If new facts contradict the basis of a decision, it is re-examined. Every change is a new version with reasons.",
   "ausnahmen": "none",
   "grenzen": "Correction does not devalue the earlier decision; it is not concealed.",
   "aus": [
    "P5"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R9",
   "name": "Fidelity to context",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "Structural rule",
   "formal": "A company may: fill variables, tighten thresholds, add rules. A company may not: remove rules, loosen thresholds, reinterpret values",
   "text": "A company makes the rules concrete through its context. It may be stricter than the group, never looser, and it may not reduce the foundation to its operational needs.",
   "ausnahmen": "A justified loosening is only possible as a change request to the group version (new version).",
   "grenzen": "The group must link the versions of both levels (version path).",
   "aus": [
    "P6"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "R10",
   "name": "Human override",
   "status": "V",
   "art": "Meta-rule",
   "formal": "Z(H) with authority may override any rule R1–R9 with reasons; the override is itself an action H' and passes through R1, R4, R8",
   "text": "Any rule can be overridden by an authorised person with reasons. The override is visible, documented and itself subject to admissibility, approval and correction.",
   "ausnahmen": "R1 (the undignified) cannot be overridden: an override that ignores W = no is itself inadmissible.",
   "grenzen": "Who has authority is set by the company's governance (context K).",
   "aus": [
    "P7"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "entscheidungslogik": {
  "ergebnisse": [
   {
    "code": "EXECUTE",
    "bedingung": "admissible, appropriate, involved, no approval required or approval granted"
   },
   {
    "code": "REBUILD",
    "bedingung": "admissible but not appropriate; change scope, timing or form and check again"
   },
   {
    "code": "CLARIFY",
    "bedingung": "uncertainty with medium or high stakes; obtain facts, then check again"
   },
   {
    "code": "INVOLVE",
    "bedingung": "those affected not involved with medium or high stakes"
   },
   {
    "code": "APPROVAL",
    "bedingung": "irreversible or high stakes; obtain the decision of the authorised person"
   },
   {
    "code": "REJECT",
    "bedingung": "not feasible or not dignified; record the reasons"
   },
   {
    "code": "HAND BACK",
    "bedingung": "not clarifiable, close weighing, rule conflict or override wanted: a human decides explicitly"
   }
  ],
  "hinweis": "The logic does not produce decisions. It sorts which check is due next and when a human must decide. Value judgements (W, A) remain value judgements."
 },
 "glossar_gruppen": [
  {
   "id": "meta",
   "name": "Core terms of the architecture"
  },
  {
   "id": "richtung",
   "name": "Direction"
  },
  {
   "id": "wertschoepfung",
   "name": "Value creation"
  },
  {
   "id": "markt",
   "name": "Market and counterpart"
  },
  {
   "id": "leistung",
   "name": "Delivery"
  },
  {
   "id": "steuerung",
   "name": "Steering"
  },
  {
   "id": "wissen",
   "name": "Data, information, knowledge"
  },
  {
   "id": "technik",
   "name": "Technology"
  },
  {
   "id": "menschen",
   "name": "People and organisation"
  },
  {
   "id": "finanzen",
   "name": "Finance"
  },
  {
   "id": "aussen",
   "name": "Purchasing and partners"
  },
  {
   "id": "recht",
   "name": "Law and duty"
  },
  {
   "id": "qualitaet",
   "name": "Quality and risk"
  },
  {
   "id": "lernen",
   "name": "Learning and development"
  },
  {
   "id": "administration",
   "name": "Administration"
  }
 ],
 "glossar": [
  {
   "id": "gruppe",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Group",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit",
    "weisheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "What several companies have in common: shared values and a shared intention. The GTN Group understands itself this way, not as a corporation.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a holding and not a legal form. It exists through those who carry its values.",
   "zweck": "Explains why the group has no colour, no industry and no clients of its own: it is what connects its companies.",
   "wertebezug": "Arises from all four values; trust is its visible effect.",
   "regel": "What happens in the group's name follows its values.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "manifestation",
    "wert",
    "partnermanagement",
    "governance"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "wert",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Value",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit",
    "weisheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "What fundamentally matters. A standard against which decisions are measured, not a goal.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a goal (has a number and a date), not a rule (has a condition), not a principle (has a direction).",
   "zweck": "Orientation for all other levels.",
   "wertebezug": "The four values form level 0 of the architecture.",
   "regel": "Values are not derived from goals or markets; goals are measured against values.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "prinzip",
    "regel",
    "vision"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "prinzip",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Principle",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "General orientation for action, derived from values.",
   "abgrenzung": "No condition, no instruction; says in which direction to act, not exactly when.",
   "zweck": "Make values workable.",
   "wertebezug": "Every principle names the values it follows from.",
   "regel": "A principle without a value link is deleted.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "wert",
    "regel"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "regel",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Rule",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "A traceable condition, limit or requirement that applies to decisions.",
   "abgrenzung": "No work instruction, no key figure; rules are context-free, their variables are filled in context.",
   "zweck": "Make decisions verifiable and transferable.",
   "wertebezug": "Rules follow from principles; they are versioned (truth) and kept (discipline).",
   "regel": "Every rule states exceptions and limits and carries a status.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "prinzip",
    "entscheidung",
    "version",
    "kontext"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "entscheidung",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Decision",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "An accountable choice between options under uncertainty, with consequences for action.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not an opinion, not an intention without implementation, not a resolution without a responsible person.",
   "zweck": "Enable action and make it attributable.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (measure), discipline (implementation), tested by the four questions.",
   "regel": "Every decision has exactly one responsible person, passes the four questions and receives care in proportion to its stakes.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "freigabe",
    "reversibilitaet",
    "tragweite",
    "zustaendigkeit"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "freigabe",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Approval",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Explicit consent of an authorised person to an action before it is carried out.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not mere acknowledgement, not approval after the fact.",
   "zweck": "Safeguard the irreversible and the consequential.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (recognising the stakes), discipline (keeping to procedure).",
   "regel": "The need for approval follows from reversibility and stakes, not from hierarchy (R4).",
   "beziehungen": [
    "entscheidung",
    "zustaendigkeit",
    "risikomanagement",
    "governance"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "reversibilitaet",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Reversibility",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The property of an action of being undoable with reasonable effort.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not the effort of the action itself, but the effort of undoing it.",
   "zweck": "Measure for the scrutiny needed before acting.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (seeing consequences), wisdom (dosing care).",
   "regel": "The reversible may happen quickly; the irreversible needs time and approval.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "freigabe",
    "tragweite",
    "risikomanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "tragweite",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Stakes",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The extent of an action's consequences for people, values, means and the future.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not effort, not urgency.",
   "zweck": "Determines participation, depth of checks and approval.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (recognising consequences and those affected).",
   "regel": "Stakes are estimated before the decision, marked with uncertainty and, when in doubt, rated higher.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "reversibilitaet",
    "freigabe",
    "risikomanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "zustaendigkeit",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Responsibility",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Assigned accountability of a person or role for decisions and results in an area.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not authority alone (being allowed), not participation (contributing).",
   "zweck": "Clarity about who decides and who carries.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (seeing responsibility), discipline (exercising it).",
   "regel": "Every decision has exactly one responsible person; participation does not replace responsibility.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "governance",
    "organisation",
    "freigabe"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "manifestation",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Manifestation",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "A company or undertaking that realises the group's values in a concrete field.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a department of the group; its own identity, its own words, its own colour.",
   "zweck": "Make values effective without diluting the group.",
   "wertebezug": "Commitment to the four values and the relationship pattern.",
   "regel": "Adopts the rules, fills in the context, may only tighten, never reduce (R9).",
   "beziehungen": [
    "kontext",
    "governance",
    "version"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "kontext",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Context",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The concrete conditions of a company: goals, resources, data, responsibilities, deadlines, thresholds, legal framework.",
   "abgrenzung": "Context fills variables; it does not change rules.",
   "zweck": "Apply universal rules to one reality.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (knowing one's own situation).",
   "regel": "Every company documents its context with a date; thresholds for stakes and deadlines are recorded there.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "manifestation",
    "regel",
    "variablen"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "version",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Version (status, date)",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "A dated version of a definition, rule or statement with the reason for the change.",
   "abgrenzung": "No history for its own sake; the old stays readable, the new applies.",
   "zweck": "Make correctability visible.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (correction), discipline (upkeep).",
   "regel": "No statement without a date; changes are justified; earlier versions remain accessible.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "wissensmanagement",
    "regel"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "unsicherheit",
   "gruppe": "meta",
   "begriff": "Uncertainty",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The state in which a variable relevant to a decision is unevidenced or contradictory.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not risk (assessed uncertainty), not ignorance that nobody notices.",
   "zweck": "Honest basis for clarifying or deciding under uncertainty.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (naming instead of glossing over).",
   "regel": "Uncertainty is named; from medium stakes upwards it is clarified before deciding (R5).",
   "beziehungen": [
    "entscheidung",
    "datenmanagement",
    "risikomanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "vision",
   "gruppe": "richtung",
   "begriff": "Vision",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Description of a desired state of the world that follows from the values.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a goal with a number, not a slogan, not a product idea.",
   "zweck": "Direction over years, independent of economic cycles and products.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (what is worth striving for), love (for whom).",
   "regel": "A vision is justified by values, not by market opportunities.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "strategie",
    "unternehmensentwicklung",
    "wert"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "strategie",
   "gruppe": "richtung",
   "begriff": "Strategy",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "A deliberate choice of which paths to the vision are pursued and which are not.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not an action plan, not a wish list.",
   "zweck": "Focus and renunciation.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (honest picture of the situation), wisdom (measure and renunciation).",
   "regel": "A strategy names what it excludes; otherwise it is none.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "vision",
    "geschaeftsmodell",
    "risikomanagement",
    "unternehmensentwicklung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "governance",
   "gruppe": "richtung",
   "begriff": "Governance",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "The order of decision rights, responsibilities and controls.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not day-to-day management, not hierarchy for its own sake.",
   "zweck": "Make decisions legitimate, traceable and attributable.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (transparency), awareness (who carries what), discipline (procedure).",
   "regel": "Every authority is documented; override is possible but visible (R10).",
   "beziehungen": [
    "zustaendigkeit",
    "compliance",
    "freigabe",
    "organisation"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "unternehmensentwicklung",
   "gruppe": "richtung",
   "begriff": "Corporate development",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Deliberate development of a company's structure, capabilities and business model.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not growth for its own sake, not reorganisation as a reflex.",
   "zweck": "Stay stable and capable of development at the same time.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (measure), discipline (implementation over a long time).",
   "regel": "Development follows strategy, not opportunity.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "strategie",
    "innovation",
    "organisation"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "geschaeftsmodell",
   "gruppe": "wertschoepfung",
   "begriff": "Business model",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Description of how a company creates and delivers value for whom and receives something in return.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not the product, not the price list.",
   "zweck": "Make viability testable.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (honest assumptions), love (value for the counterpart first).",
   "regel": "A business model that only works through the counterpart's ignorance is inadmissible.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "wertschoepfung",
    "vertrieb",
    "finanzplanung",
    "strategie"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "wertschoepfung",
   "gruppe": "wertschoepfung",
   "begriff": "Value creation",
   "werte": [
    "liebe",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The steps in which knowledge, work and means become a benefit for the counterpart.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not revenue, not employment.",
   "zweck": "Show where benefit really arises.",
   "wertebezug": "Love (benefit for others), wisdom (measure of effort).",
   "regel": "Every step names for whom it creates value; otherwise it is dropped.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "leistungserbringung",
    "prozessmanagement",
    "geschaeftsmodell"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "marketing",
   "gruppe": "markt",
   "begriff": "Marketing",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Understanding need and making an offer visible to those who might need it.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not persuasion, not sales.",
   "zweck": "Fit between need and offer.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (no claim without evidence), love (taking need seriously).",
   "regel": "Every outward statement is evidenced and dated; no superlatives, no artificial urgency.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "vertrieb",
    "kommunikation",
    "geschaeftsmodell"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "vertrieb",
   "gruppe": "markt",
   "begriff": "Sales",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "The path from interest to the counterpart's decision, including advice and closing.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not marketing (visibility), not customer success (delivery on the promise).",
   "zweck": "Enable decisions, not force them.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (evidence instead of pressure), wisdom (not every deal), love (the counterpart's interest).",
   "regel": "Convince yes, persuade no. A deal against the counterpart's interest is not dignified.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "marketing",
    "customer_success",
    "geschaeftsmodell",
    "partnermanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "customer_success",
   "gruppe": "markt",
   "begriff": "Customer success (delivering on promises)",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "liebe",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Ensuring that after closing the counterpart actually receives the promised benefit.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not support alone, not upselling.",
   "zweck": "Keep promises; earn trust.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (delivery), love (care), truth (naming deviations).",
   "regel": "Every promise has a place that checks its delivery and names deviations to the counterpart.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "vertrieb",
    "leistungserbringung",
    "qualitaetsmanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "produktentwicklung",
   "gruppe": "leistung",
   "begriff": "Product development",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Designing services and products from need, feasibility and values.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not innovation (search), not service delivery (operation).",
   "zweck": "Give benefit a form.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (real need), wisdom (measure, no overloading).",
   "regel": "No product without a named need and named limits.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "innovation",
    "leistungserbringung",
    "qualitaetsmanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "leistungserbringung",
   "gruppe": "leistung",
   "begriff": "Service delivery",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "The actual delivery of the promised service in quality, time and scope.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not sales, not development.",
   "zweck": "Make value creation effective.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (keeping promises), love (care).",
   "regel": "What is promised is what is delivered; deviations are named to the counterpart before, not after.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "operations",
    "customer_success",
    "prozessmanagement",
    "wertschoepfung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "operations",
   "gruppe": "leistung",
   "begriff": "Operations",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The ongoing running of all recurring activities that enable delivery.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a project (one-off, with an end).",
   "zweck": "Reliability.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (repetition), awareness (seeing disruptions early).",
   "regel": "What recurs is described, measured and has a responsible person.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "prozessmanagement",
    "leistungserbringung",
    "it"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "projektmanagement",
   "gruppe": "steuerung",
   "begriff": "Project management",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Steering one-off undertakings with a goal, an end and limited means.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a process (recurring).",
   "zweck": "Reach the goal within time and means.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (planning with measure), discipline (deadlines), truth (unvarnished status).",
   "regel": "A project has a goal, an end, a responsible person and named risks; status is reported unvarnished.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "prozessmanagement",
    "risikomanagement",
    "zustaendigkeit"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "prozessmanagement",
   "gruppe": "steuerung",
   "begriff": "Process management",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Designing and maintaining recurring workflows.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a project, not bureaucracy.",
   "zweck": "Repeatability and learning.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (connections in the flow), discipline (adherence).",
   "regel": "A process serves a benefit; if it serves none, it is abolished (P7).",
   "beziehungen": [
    "operations",
    "qualitaetsmanagement",
    "kontinuierliche_verbesserung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "datenmanagement",
   "gruppe": "wissen",
   "begriff": "Data management",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Collecting, storing, maintaining and protecting data of known origin and quality.",
   "abgrenzung": "Data is raw material, not information.",
   "zweck": "Reliable basis for everything else.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (origin, date, correctness).",
   "regel": "Every datum has a source, a date and an owner; per topic there is one leading source.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "informationsmanagement",
    "datenschutz",
    "systemintegration"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "informationsmanagement",
   "gruppe": "wissen",
   "begriff": "Information management",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Turning data into meaning and making it available to those who need it for decisions.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not storage (data), not experience (knowledge).",
   "zweck": "Ability to decide.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (connection), truth (status).",
   "regel": "Information carries a status: evidenced, derived or hypothesis.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "datenmanagement",
    "wissensmanagement",
    "kommunikation"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "wissensmanagement",
   "gruppe": "wissen",
   "begriff": "Knowledge management",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Capturing experience and insight so that they remain available independently of people and tools.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a document archive, not a database.",
   "zweck": "Continuity and learning.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (status, date), wisdom (experience), discipline (upkeep).",
   "regel": "Lasting knowledge lives where the work happens, with date and status; never only in one head or one tool.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "informationsmanagement",
    "lernen",
    "version"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "it",
   "gruppe": "technik",
   "begriff": "Technology and IT",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Technical systems that carry data, processes and communication.",
   "abgrenzung": "A means, not an end.",
   "zweck": "Provide capabilities reliably and securely.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (operation, security), love (serves people).",
   "regel": "No system without an owner, backup and access rules; security before convenience.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "datenmanagement",
    "ki",
    "systemintegration",
    "datenschutz"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ki",
   "gruppe": "technik",
   "begriff": "Artificial intelligence",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Systems that generate patterns, texts or proposals from data and prepare decisions.",
   "abgrenzung": "AI prepares; it does not decide the irreversible.",
   "zweck": "Capacity and consistency.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (checking evidence), awareness (knowing limits), discipline (approval stays with humans).",
   "regel": "AI results carry status and source; irreversible actions remain with humans (R4, R10).",
   "beziehungen": [
    "it",
    "wissensmanagement",
    "governance"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "systemintegration",
   "gruppe": "technik",
   "begriff": "System integration",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Connecting systems so that data is captured once and used consistently everywhere.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not the individual system.",
   "zweck": "One truth per datum.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (consistency), awareness (dependencies).",
   "regel": "One leading source, one defined flow direction, no write-back without a rule.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "it",
    "datenmanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "hr",
   "gruppe": "menschen",
   "begriff": "People and personnel (HR)",
   "werte": [
    "liebe",
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Finding, onboarding, developing and supporting the people who work with us, in every contractual form.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not personnel administration alone.",
   "zweck": "Capability and belonging.",
   "wertebezug": "Love (the worth of the person), truth (honest feedback), discipline (reliability).",
   "regel": "Every collaboration has clear expectations, fair compensation and honest feedback.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "organisation",
    "zusammenarbeit",
    "lernen"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "organisation",
   "gruppe": "menschen",
   "begriff": "Organisation",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The order of roles, responsibilities and workflows.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not hierarchy for its own sake; categories are tools.",
   "zweck": "Clarity about who carries what.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (connections), wisdom (appropriate structure).",
   "regel": "Every task has a role, every role a person; structures can change and are dated.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "zustaendigkeit",
    "governance",
    "hr"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "kommunikation",
   "gruppe": "menschen",
   "begriff": "Communication",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Exchange of information and meaning, internal and external.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not marketing, not advertising.",
   "zweck": "A shared picture of the situation.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (in substance), love (in form).",
   "regel": "Truth in substance, appreciation in form; uncertainty is named.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "informationsmanagement",
    "zusammenarbeit",
    "marketing"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "zusammenarbeit",
   "gruppe": "menschen",
   "begriff": "Collaboration",
   "werte": [
    "liebe",
    "disziplin",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Working together on results across roles and companies.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not coordination without a result.",
   "zweck": "Participation and effectiveness.",
   "wertebezug": "Love (participation), discipline (keeping commitments), awareness (knowing those affected).",
   "regel": "Those affected are involved or informed; commitments are kept or withdrawn in good time.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "kommunikation",
    "hr",
    "projektmanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "finanzen",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Finance",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The whole of a company's means, obligations and payment flows.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not bookkeeping (recording), not controlling (comparison).",
   "zweck": "Ability to act.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (the figures are right), wisdom (measure).",
   "regel": "Figures are true, complete and timely; no decision without knowledge of the means.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "controlling",
    "buchhaltung",
    "liquiditaet",
    "treasury"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "controlling",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Controlling",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Comparing plan and reality, with conclusions for decisions.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not bookkeeping, not control of people.",
   "zweck": "Learning from deviation.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (naming the deviation), awareness (seeing the cause).",
   "regel": "Every deviation has an explanation and a decision.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "finanzplanung",
    "buchhaltung",
    "strategie",
    "cashflow"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "buchhaltung",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Bookkeeping",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Complete, legally compliant recording of all business transactions.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not planning, not steering.",
   "zweck": "Evidence and obligation.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (completeness), discipline (timeliness).",
   "regel": "No transaction without a voucher, no voucher without a booking, promptly.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "finanzen",
    "abrechnung",
    "compliance"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "abrechnung",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Billing and settlement",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Determining and communicating what is owed to whom: clients, partners, staff.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not bookkeeping (recording), not debt collection.",
   "zweck": "Fairness in exchange.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (correct), love (fair and comprehensible).",
   "regel": "Every settlement can be recalculated by its recipient.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "buchhaltung",
    "partnermanagement",
    "customer_success"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "treasury",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Treasury",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Managing cash, accounts, reserves and financing.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not bookkeeping, not controlling.",
   "zweck": "Solvency at all times.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (reserve as measure), discipline (keeping rules).",
   "regel": "Reserves are defined; financing follows viability, not opportunity.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "liquiditaet",
    "finanzplanung",
    "finanzen"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "liquiditaet",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Liquidity",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "The ability to meet obligations as they fall due at any time.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not profit, not assets.",
   "zweck": "Survival before profit.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (unvarnished), discipline (forward-looking).",
   "regel": "Liquidity is viewed ahead of time; shortfalls are named early, never concealed.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "cashflow",
    "treasury",
    "finanzplanung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "cashflow",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Cash flow",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "The course of incoming and outgoing payments over time.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not profit (accrued), not revenue.",
   "zweck": "Visibility of payment flows.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (what really flows).",
   "regel": "Payment flows are planned per period and compared with actuals.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "liquiditaet",
    "finanzplanung",
    "controlling"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "finanzplanung",
   "gruppe": "finanzen",
   "begriff": "Financial planning",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "A forward-looking view of income, expenses and payment flows over a period, with assumptions.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not a forecast presented as a claim.",
   "zweck": "Decisions with figures.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (assumptions open), wisdom (ranges instead of false precision).",
   "regel": "Every planned figure has a named assumption and a range.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "controlling",
    "cashflow",
    "strategie",
    "geschaeftsmodell"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "einkauf",
   "gruppe": "aussen",
   "begriff": "Purchasing",
   "werte": [
    "weisheit",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Procuring services and goods on appropriate terms.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not partner management (relationship), not contract law.",
   "zweck": "Use means economically.",
   "wertebezug": "Wisdom (measure), love (a fair price for suppliers too).",
   "regel": "Terms are clear, comparisons documented, dependencies known.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "partnermanagement",
    "finanzen",
    "recht"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "partnermanagement",
   "gruppe": "aussen",
   "begriff": "Partner management",
   "werte": [
    "liebe",
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Building and maintaining relationships with organisations with which value is created together.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not purchasing, not sales.",
   "zweck": "The network: a shared identity without displacement.",
   "wertebezug": "Love (the partner's worth), truth (no hidden interests), discipline (commitments).",
   "regel": "Interests and terms are open; performance is acknowledged; dependencies are named.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "einkauf",
    "vertrieb",
    "governance",
    "abrechnung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "recht",
   "gruppe": "recht",
   "begriff": "Law",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Legal design and protection of contracts, rights and obligations.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not compliance (adherence), not data protection (a sub-area).",
   "zweck": "Clarity and protection for both sides.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (understandable), wisdom (sustainable).",
   "regel": "Contracts are understandable and carry both sides; what is unclear is clarified, not exploited.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "compliance",
    "datenschutz",
    "partnermanagement",
    "einkauf"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "compliance",
   "gruppe": "recht",
   "begriff": "Compliance",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Demonstrable adherence to laws, contracts and one's own rules.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not law (design).",
   "zweck": "Trust and protection.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (adherence), truth (evidence).",
   "regel": "Obligations are known, assigned and checked; breaches are named and remedied.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "recht",
    "governance",
    "datenschutz",
    "buchhaltung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "datenschutz",
   "gruppe": "recht",
   "begriff": "Data protection",
   "werte": [
    "liebe",
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Protecting personal data according to the law and the dignity of those concerned.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not IT security alone.",
   "zweck": "Dignity and duty.",
   "wertebezug": "Love (dignity), truth (transparency), discipline (procedure).",
   "regel": "Data stays where it is needed; no duplicates in general storage; those concerned know what happens.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "datenmanagement",
    "compliance",
    "it"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "qualitaetsmanagement",
   "gruppe": "qualitaet",
   "begriff": "Quality management",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "disziplin",
    "liebe"
   ],
   "definition": "Systematically ensuring that services meet requirements and promises.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not final inspection alone.",
   "zweck": "Keep promises.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (measure), discipline (fix), love (care).",
   "regel": "Requirements are defined, deviations measured, causes removed.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "leistungserbringung",
    "prozessmanagement",
    "kontinuierliche_verbesserung",
    "customer_success"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "risikomanagement",
   "gruppe": "qualitaet",
   "begriff": "Risk management",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "weisheit",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Identifying, assessing and treating uncertainties that threaten goals.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not avoidance at any price.",
   "zweck": "Carry stakes consciously.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (seeing), wisdom (weighing), truth (naming).",
   "regel": "Risks are named, assessed by stakes, probability and reversibility and assigned; the irreversible with approval.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "tragweite",
    "reversibilitaet",
    "freigabe",
    "compliance",
    "projektmanagement"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "innovation",
   "gruppe": "lernen",
   "begriff": "Innovation",
   "werte": [
    "bewusstheit",
    "weisheit",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Searching for and testing new ways of creating value.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not product development (elaboration), not novelty for its own sake.",
   "zweck": "Capacity for development.",
   "wertebezug": "Awareness (seeing what is missing), wisdom (measure), truth (honest assessment).",
   "regel": "Experiments are small, reversible and honestly assessed.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "produktentwicklung",
    "lernen",
    "unternehmensentwicklung"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "lernen",
   "gruppe": "lernen",
   "begriff": "Learning",
   "werte": [
    "wahrheit",
    "weisheit",
    "disziplin"
   ],
   "definition": "Gaining insight from experience and recording it.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not training alone.",
   "zweck": "Wisdom grows only this way.",
   "wertebezug": "Truth (what happened), wisdom (what follows), discipline (doing the review).",
   "regel": "Every completed decision with stakes gets a short dated review.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "wissensmanagement",
    "kontinuierliche_verbesserung",
    "hr"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "kontinuierliche_verbesserung",
   "gruppe": "lernen",
   "begriff": "Continuous improvement",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "bewusstheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Ongoing small adjustments to processes and services from observation and feedback.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not innovation, not a project.",
   "zweck": "Maintain quality and appropriateness.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (ongoing), awareness (observing).",
   "regel": "Improvements are small, documented and measurable.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "prozessmanagement",
    "qualitaetsmanagement",
    "lernen"
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "administration",
   "gruppe": "administration",
   "begriff": "Administration",
   "werte": [
    "disziplin",
    "wahrheit"
   ],
   "definition": "Administrative activities that maintain the framework: contracts, deadlines, filing, authorities.",
   "abgrenzung": "Not the operation of the service (operations).",
   "zweck": "Order and fulfilment of duties.",
   "wertebezug": "Discipline (deadlines), truth (complete records).",
   "regel": "Deadlines and obligations are recorded, assigned and reminded.",
   "beziehungen": [
    "compliance",
    "buchhaltung",
    "organisation"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "schema_konkretisierung": {
  "gruppe": "universal values, principles, rules, variables and glossary (this version)",
  "manifestation_liefert": [
   "Context K: goals, resources, data sources, legal framework, with date",
   "Responsibilities Z per type of decision and their authority (approval rights)",
   "Thresholds: when stakes are medium or high (e.g. amount, people affected, duration), what counts as irreversible",
   "Deadlines t_max per type of decision and clarification time t",
   "Mapping of its own values to the four values of the group",
   "Mapping of its own functions and roles to the glossary",
   "Additional rules (only stricter, never looser) and their reasons",
   "Version path: which group version its own version is based on"
  ],
  "operative_ebene": "Decisions and actions that follow from rules plus filled-in context; they carry a date, a responsible person and, where needed, an approval.",
  "reihenfolge": [
   "GTN Energie (first concretisation)",
   "GTN Finanz",
   "further companies"
  ],
  "grundsatz": "The group defines the why and the abstract rules. The company makes them concrete without reducing the foundation to its operational reality."
 },
 "versionen": [
  {
   "version": "0.3",
   "datum": "2026-10-17",
   "aenderungen": "Self-understanding added: the group is what its companies have in common (new core term “group”). Group pages without reference to industries or target groups.",
   "begruendung": "Nicolai, 17 Oct 2026."
  },
  {
   "version": "0.2",
   "datum": "2026-10-17",
   "aenderungen": "Five dimensions examined: love as the inner form of appreciation (value), discipline as implementation principle (not a value). Four decision questions changed to appropriate / possible / dignified / involved; the questions of version 0.1 are absorbed into them. Glossary (55 terms), variables, rules R1–R10, decision logic, concretisation schema added.",
   "begruendung": "Master prompt Knowledge & Rules Architecture 0.2 (Nicolai, 17 Oct 2026)."
  },
  {
   "version": "0.1",
   "datum": "2026-10-17",
   "aenderungen": "Identity & design guide: four values (with appreciation), principles P1–P7, four questions (Is it true? Connection? Appropriate? Honours?), brand architecture.",
   "begruendung": "Master prompt Identity, Values & Design Philosophy (Nicolai, 17 Oct 2026)."
  }
 ],
 "offene_fragen": [
  {
   "id": "O1",
   "frage": "Love or appreciation as the public word? This version: love as the value, appreciation as its outward evidence.",
   "status": "H"
  },
  {
   "id": "O2",
   "frage": "Discipline as implementation principle rather than a fifth value: confirm or reject?",
   "status": "A, needs confirmation"
  },
  {
   "id": "O3",
   "frage": "Reading of “Are we all involved?”: those affected (participation) and those acting (commitment), both? This version: both.",
   "status": "H"
  },
  {
   "id": "O4",
   "frage": "Legality within “Is it possible?” or as a question of its own?",
   "status": "H"
  },
  {
   "id": "O5",
   "frage": "Thresholds for stakes (low/medium/high), reversibility and deadlines: to be set per company (GTN Energie first).",
   "status": "open"
  },
  {
   "id": "O6",
   "frage": "Who in the group holds override rights (R10) and approval authority (R4)? A governance document is missing.",
   "status": "open"
  },
  {
   "id": "O7",
   "frage": "Validation: run rules R1–R10 against ten real decisions of GTN Energie, have the team review the glossary.",
   "status": "open"
  },
  {
   "id": "O8",
   "frage": "Machine readability: define a JSON schema, keep term IDs stable, change only through versions.",
   "status": "open"
  },
  {
   "id": "O9",
   "frage": "Home page and stance name four values with appreciation; the knowledge base names love as the value. Deliberately so (O1) or align?",
   "status": "S"
  }
 ],
 "qualitaet": [
  {
   "frage": "Are the definitions clear enough?",
   "befund": "Every term has a definition and a boundary. “Appropriate”, “dignified” and “stakes” remain normative: they only become comparable through thresholds in a company's context (O5).",
   "status": "A"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Can the rules be derived from values and principles?",
   "befund": "Every rule names the principles it follows from; every principle names its values. The chain is fully documented but not yet tested on real cases (O7).",
   "status": "A"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Are the levels separated?",
   "befund": "Values contain no conditions, rules no figures; figures only appear in a company's context. Discipline was moved from the value level to the principle level because it has no content of its own.",
   "status": "A"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Are categories treated as tools?",
   "befund": "The glossary groups are aids to order; overlaps are made visible through relations instead of being defined away. Structures can change and are dated.",
   "status": "A"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Do the rules work under conflicting goals?",
   "befund": "Conflicts between the questions are named and given precedence rules; genuine value conflicts go to a human (R10, outcome HAND BACK).",
   "status": "V"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Is it clear when a human must decide?",
   "befund": "Yes: five named cases, the outcomes APPROVAL and HAND BACK, rules R5 and R10. Not even a human can approve the undignified.",
   "status": "V"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Are the rules transferable?",
   "befund": "The rules contain no industry terms; differences lie only in variables, thresholds and responsibilities (R9). This is only proven after the first concretisation with GTN Energie.",
   "status": "H"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Is the knowledge base machine-readable and maintainable?",
   "befund": "One source (data/wissen.json) with stable IDs generates page and document. A formal JSON schema is still missing (O8).",
   "status": "A"
  },
  {
   "frage": "Is anything normative presented as provable?",
   "befund": "No. The formal notation orders conditions; W and A remain value judgements of a responsible person.",
   "status": "A"
  }
 ]
}